Arvin it's the same with the deal at GITMO! No civil trials if GITMO is closed and the detainees are moved to a different place; what the heck is that? If we as America are treating the detainees in a civil manner and if GITMO is a healthy place to live: no malaria, no toxic waste, and the likes, what the heck true difference, can a geographical location make? Someone please explain this difference to me in realistic and reasonable terms. This surely can't be all about protecting Barack Obama's ego? If so, America truly did elect the wrong man to be President. Perhaps the detainees would like a nice new home in Greenland, we have Army bases there, don't we?