Eheads At The Fountain

Friday, February 12, 2010

Sallies, scientists have taught us that the earth is millions of years old.  That it has gone through: ice ages, this age, and that age, and now they are telling us that 30 years of speculative data i.e. three decades, of theoretical data is enough evidence, to incur extra cost upon tax payers.  So now we have to deal with all this, because they are absolutely certain Global Warming must be fought with higher taxes.       Arvin I have nothing new to say on this subject, "Yes we need to learn how to burn carbon fuels as efficiently as possible;" that's only practical.  Yet to burden tax payers, with added cost based on data that has been collect, for only thirty years - given the age of the earth and all the volcanic activity and all other activities - seems to me to be nothing but a way to garner higher taxes, for pet project or maybe to line the pockets of certain senators, congressmen, and others that may benefit from higher taxes.  I think we should have at least three hundred years of data, before we make such outrageous prediction on the global weather.

»Back«